Before you scroll: I write a newsletter for MedTech teams who do not want to be surprised by IEC 60601-1, 4th edition. Plain-language updates on the fragments, the working groups, and what each change means for design, QMS, labeling, and testing. Subscribe here and get the next update in your inbox.

This was a week of learning I will not forget, and one that reminded me why I do this work. Strip away the standard numbers, the acronyms, the requirements, and the test reports, and the whole event came back to a core concept: keep the patient at the center and keep them safe. That is the thread I want to pull through this longer recap, the one that did not fit in a single LinkedIn post.

A quick note on format. On LinkedIn I kept this tight. Here on the blog I have room to go deeper, so this version adds more on the structure of 4th edition, more on how I think about the Conformity Evaluation Plan and File, and a closing section on what I am personally carrying back to the standards committees. If you only have two minutes, the LinkedIn version covers the highlights. If you want the real detail, you are in the right place.

Why I keep saying “get ahead of 4th edition”

Let me set the stage, because it is the backbone of almost everything I presented this week. IEC 60601-1, 4th edition is not a distant, someday concern. It is being actively drafted right now, fragment by fragment, across a set of working groups (broadly WG 37 through WG 48), and all of those fragments have already circulated Committee Drafts (CD1s, and some have done CD2s). The collateral standards many of us have treated as separate documents are being folded into the core of 60601-1. The structure is moving toward clearer, more “atomic” requirements, each one distinct and design-ready, with rationale attached and tighter alignment to the IMDRF Essential Principles. The scope is broadening to span lay users and professional users, home and EMS and professional environments, and patients of every age, human and animal.

Here is why that matters to you, not just to standards people like me. When this edition lands, the gap between a product designed against 3rd edition assumptions and one designed with 4th edition in mind will show up as redesign, retesting, and documentation rework. That is the expensive way to meet a standard. The inexpensive way is to read the direction of travel now and bake it into your design inputs, your risk management file, your labeling, and your test strategy while you still have design freedom. That is the whole argument in one breath: plan now, avoid the fire drills later.

It started Monday in Boxborough: TÜV Rheinland and IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition

The week kicked off in Boxborough, Massachusetts, with TÜV Rheinland North America’s first IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition seminar, held at their Northeast Technology and Innovation Center. I shared the stage with Caitlin Brady and Elizabeth Casey, and for the Q&A we pulled in two additional local experts from our Working Groups, Ashleigh McNaboe and Jenna Smolko-Jaser. Dr. Nicholas T. Kirkland kindly introduced me that morning and even worked my Star Trek podcast into the introduction, which set a warm and slightly playful tone for a deep technical day. You can listen to the podcast here.

That left me as the only man on the panel, standing alongside four exceptional women in STEM, and I could not have been prouder to be there. These are not token seats. On the standards committees I work with, women like these are among the strongest, most technically capable people in the room, the ones I lean on and learn from. Our field is finally heading in the right direction on this, and it needs to keep going. When I started more than 40 years ago, engineering and the technical fields were a hard place for women. It is better now, I see real progress even in my son’s college, though equity is still a work in progress. Panels and committees stacked with talent like this are how we close the gap, and being outnumbered by minds that sharp is an honor every single time.

If you could not join live, the recording and the slide deck are available here.

A deeper look at the CEF and CEP, and why “Bridge, not wait”

At IMSC26 I ran a 4-hour workshop, “Building and Using an IEC 60601 Conformity Evaluation File for Today and Tomorrow,” with a group of about 20. Without reproducing the workshop materials, here is the thinking, because it is useful even if you were not in the room.

The problem the CEF and CEP solve is fragmentation. Today, evidence tends to live in silos: test reports here, design reviews there, the risk management file somewhere else, the usability engineering file in its own world. Different formats, different levels of detail, and a reviewer at a test lab or Notified Body who has to hunt to piece it together. A Conformity Evaluation Plan flips that. You plan, up front, how each applicable requirement will be evaluated, then the Conformity Evaluation File becomes the executed plan with the evidence attached and traceable from requirement to hazard to test method to acceptance criteria to result. It is the difference between a complete file and a usable one, a distinction that came up in other sessions this week as well.

The line I kept coming back to was “Bridge, not wait.” 3rd edition does not require a formal CEP, but nothing stops you from adopting the mindset now. Teams that build this muscle today will transition into 4th edition smoothly, and they will hand reviewers a cleaner package in the meantime. If you want the practical version of this for your own projects, that is exactly the kind of thing I help clients set up, and the kind of thing I write about in the newsletter.

Quick break: If this level of detail is useful, it is a sample of what I send out. Subscribe to the newsletter for plain-language 4th edition updates and practical compliance tips you can actually use.

I also delivered a 45-minute session, “The Impact of IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition on RA/QA, Design, Document Control, Test, Supply Chain, and Management,” to a room of close to 100 with more online, and even a few of my own clients in the seats. The point of that talk was to take the drivers behind the next edition and trace them into the real work across functions, because a standard change is never just an engineering change. It ripples into your QMS procedures, your document control, your supplier and test planning, and your management reviews.

A quick note on why this is my lane: I co-convene IEC/TC 62/SC 62A/WG 39 (user interface for IEC 60601-1, 4th edition), am a member of IEC/TC 62/SC 62A/WG 37 (general requirements) and IEC/TC 62/SC 62A/AG 50 (the editing team leading the 4th edition of IEC 60601-1), serve as US co-chair of AAMI TAG 62D on electromedical equipment, and sit on ISO/TC 210/WG 2. A lot of what I shared comes straight from inside the rooms where this edition is being written.

It also meant a lot to hear Jean-Yves Pairet, Quality Assurance Director at CLEIO, write that the workshop “made a clear case for preparing for IEC 60601-1 4th edition now, rather than waiting four years for it to roll out,” and that he left “with a practical, immediately usable approach CLEIO can already apply to current projects.” Practical and immediately usable is exactly what I am going for.

The talks that stuck with me

Michelle Tarver, MD, PhD, Director of FDA’s CDRH, delivered a keynote that was simply outstanding, with patient safety running clearly through the entire keynote. She covered the Case for Quality programs (the Voluntary Improvement Program and the Achieving Quality Excellence Collaborative Community), the Accreditation Scheme for Conformity Assessment (ASCA), supply chain resilience including the very real PFAS challenge, and QMSR, now in effect and incorporating ISO 13485:2016. The common thread, and the reason it ties to my own message, is that every one of those rewards teams who prepare early instead of scrambling at a deadline.

James Pink gave a talk I, and many of us, will be thinking about for a long time: “When You Become the Patient: A Safety Professional on the Other Side of the Decision.” He laid out what the formal risk model does well (sets the safety assessment scope, identifies hazards and hazardous situations, defines controls and acceptable residual risk, supports surveillance and signal detection) and what lies outside its boundary: cross-device effects over time, the psychological burden between appointments, the cumulative impact of “acceptable” events, and the lived experience across encounters.

His concept of “bound risk” has stuck with me. The manufacturer owns the chain up to the device-level event, but the path from a hazardous situation to actual patient harm gets distributed to the health institutions that control the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. His example: an MRI down in a radiology suite. Nobody is crushed or burned, the file says no harm, and meanwhile patients sit stalled on the diagnostic pathway with a clock ticking inside them. That is harm. It just is not the kind our current files capture. He also made the uncomfortable point that adverse events are among the weakest signals we will ever get, because the system often needs someone to be seriously injured before anyone investigates properly.

James and I have known each other for about five years and have worked through plenty of medical device and IEC 60601-1 questions together, so this one lands close to home. During the Q&A I told him I would be thrilled to have him speak to the IEC TC 62, SC 62A, and the 4th Edition IEC 60601-1 teams writing the standard. Here is why. We still do not focus enough on the patient. We focus on the engineering and the technology, and those matter, but technology and standards are only one piece of the puzzle. The patient pathway is just as critical, and arguably more. A device can pass every clause we write and still leave a patient stalled, anxious, and unsafe somewhere along their journey. The people writing the standards need to hear this clearly, and hearing it from someone directly impacted who also understands the risk management perspective drives the point home far better than I could on my own.

Susan Neadle presented on “Streamlined” Risk Management for Drug-Device Combination Products, touching on the draft Technical Specification ISO TS 24971-3 (guidance on applying ISO 14971 to combination products) and the integration path with AAMI TIR 105. The problem she names is one anyone working at the intersection of device, drug, and user knows in their bones: multiple frameworks (ISO 14971 for the device, ICH Q9(R1) for the drug) overlap, execution is siloed, and the result is inconsistent terminology, traceability gaps, and interaction risks that go under-assessed, especially the drug-device interactions and the way a user actually handles the combined system. Streamlined does not mean lighter. It means connected, consistent, and decision-driving. David Cronin of Cognition followed with a strong session on minimizing patient risk at the intersection of drug and device risks. Meeting David in person was a real highlight. He carries deep knowledge across medtech, pharma, and combination products, and he and Susan go way back, which showed in how naturally their two talks complemented each other.

A personal highlight: Susan and I were initially scheduled at the same time, and she asked Bijan to reschedule so she could watch my presentation. That kind of attention to detail from Bijan is part of what makes this conference special, and it honestly blew me away. I have had huge respect for Susan for many years as the combination products expert, and she knows me, as many do, as the IEC 60601 Guy. There is a lot of mutual respect in this conference and a huge amount of knowledge and decades of experience to tap into.

Friday panels: what do we really mean by “risk,” and how mature is it?

Friday brought panels, a new addition this year, and they delivered. One of the liveliest was “What Do We Really Mean by ‘Risk’? US vs EU Perspectives,” a genuinely useful debate about how the same word carries different weight on different sides of the Atlantic. It sounds academic until it shows up in your submission strategy and your acceptable-risk arguments.

Fubin Wu’s panel introduced his Risk Management Maturity Model (RM3), and I am very glad I sat through it. It is a first-principles effort to answer a question we rarely measure well: what does good, and great, risk management actually look like, and how do you grow toward it? The panel brought together FDA voices including co-chairs Keisha Thomas and Melissa Burns alongside industry core-team members. As Fubin puts it, RM3 pushes past “did we follow the process?” to a deeper question: “are we making decisions with confidence that fulfill the intent of the process to serve patients?” With QMSR now in force, that shift from better documentation to better decision-making is the real work.

AI, human factors, and more sessions worth your time

My associates at Prodct Studio, Christie Johnson and Devon C. Campbell, ran a fantastic Tuesday workshop, “The AI-Powered MedTech Professional.” They also know how to host. I may have “dragged” a few TÜV Rheinland friends to their Monday-night party. Great hosts, every time.

I did not catch all of Shannon Hoste’s usability sessions, and I wanted to. Her work asks a question our whole field needs to sit with: are human factors processes ready for AI in medical devices? The risks she maps (automation bias, loss of situational awareness, and function allocation between human and AI) are real use-related hazards, and the comfortable assumptions, like “the clinician will catch it,” do not hold up. Her two-part HFE workshop with Jonathan Kendler, on factoring human factors data into your risk file and safety case, is exactly the kind of practical, on-the-ground content I look for.

One session I did sit through and keep thinking about was Steve Gompertz and Jean Blom’s “Hidden Influences: How Risk Management Can Go Wrong.” It gave us a phrase worth posting in every quality department: “dysfunctional compliance,” where the process is followed precisely but the results still are not acceptable, because the focus drifts to how the work gets done instead of the value it is meant to produce. Risk management is done by humans, and the human factors of decision-making belong inside our risk process.

The fun version: standards are star maps

If you want the more playful version of the philosophy underneath all of this, enjoy The Podcast episode where I joined Faisal Kamal, “The Star Map to the Future.” The core idea: IEC 60601 is not a rulebook, it is a star map built from decades of engineering mistakes, test data, regulatory learning, and field experience. We even used the Star Trek tricorder as an analogy for the electronic devices now used in homes and EMS environments, the noisy, unpredictable, RF-filled spaces that 4th edition deliberately pushes us to design for. There is also a companion write-up, What’s NASA & Star Trek have to do with IEC 60601?

What I am carrying back to the committees

Conferences like this are not just about what you present, they are about what you take home to the work. Three things are coming back with me into the standards rooms. First, the patient pathway belongs in our thinking, not just the device-level event, and James Pink made that case better than anyone. Second, maturity matters more than compliance, and RM3 gives us a vocabulary for it. Third, the human side of risk, the biases and blind spots Gompertz and Blom mapped, deserves a seat at the table inside our risk process, not as an afterthought. If we hold those three together while we write 4th edition, we end up with a standard that protects real people in real environments, which is the entire point.

Resources to get ahead of IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition

If this left you wanting a head start, here is where I would point you first:

• IEC 60601, 4th Edition: What’s Changing and How to Prepare — my strategic-shifts overview and companion to the Easy Medical Device podcast episode.
• IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition Survival Guide: Why It Matters for MedTech
• IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition: Design Controls and QMS Impacts You Need to Know
• Get Your Reviewer’s Hat On: 4th Edition Draft Fragments Have Dropped
• From Engineer to “The IEC 60601 Guy” (Project Medtech Podcast)

The part that matters most

The theme of the whole week was patient safety and risk management, but the human side stuck with me just as much. I finally met people in person whom I have worked with for years, in some cases for decades. Voices and email signatures became handshakes and hugs. That never gets old. I had great conversations with Fubin Wu and David Bonnett on the risk maturity work, time with Susan Neadle, James Pink, David Cronin, Steve Gompertz, and Jean Blom, and real face time with Bijan Elahi himself. There were genuinely too many good people to name them all here, and that is a wonderful problem to have. A small backstory I am proud of: Caitlin Brady and Elizabeth Casey of TÜV Rheinland were at IMSC26 because I suggested they sponsor, and they grabbed the very last sponsor spot. Sometimes a nudge at the right moment is all it takes.

A heartfelt thank you to Bijan Elahi, Jamie D. Selby and the entire volunteer team, to my TÜV Rheinland North America colleagues, and to Christie Johnson, Devon C. Campbell, and the Prodct Studio crew. IMSC alternates between the US and Europe so attendees on both sides of the Atlantic get a fair shot, and IMSC27 heads to Europe, with Ireland, Belgium, and Portugal in serious consideration.

Onward. And if you are writing standards or developing products, keep the patient at the center.

Live long and prosper, and keep your patients safe, in every environment, be it on earth or in space , on every device. To infinity and beyond, we can design for patient safety, in all its forms, if we really set our minds to it, with such a dedicated set of great minds as this group.

Do not let the next 4th edition update pass you by.

I send practical, plain-language guidance on IEC 60601-1, 4th edition and the broader 60601 and 61010 world, written for the people who actually have to design, test, document, and certify these products. No fluff, just what helps you get ahead of the curve.

Subscribe to the newsletter

Schedule a call with Leo Learn more about our work

Leonard “Leo” Eisner · The IEC 60601 Guy · Eisner Safety Consultants

IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition Survival Guide – Why It Matters For MedTech

The 4th Edition of IEC 60601-1 is no longer a future concern. Eleven of the twelve hazard fragments (WGs 37–48) have circulated Committee Drafts (CDs). All fragments have issued first CDs (WG 47 is at CD2), except WG 45 (Optical Radiation Hazards).

That means manufacturers, design houses, trade associations, test houses, and regulators must follow the working group outputs closely. If you cannot stay directly engaged in National or International (IEC) committees, you will need trusted expert guidance. These changes will impact design, QMS, labeling and IFUs, documentation, and test strategies.

Download the One-Pager: 9 Things RA/QA Leaders Must Know

Quick to read and easy to share with RA/QA, Design, Documentation, Supply Chain, Test, and Management. Use it to brief teams and kick off transition planning for IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition.

Your 4-Part Survival Kit

Download One-Pager PDF Watch Webinar Replay Summary Article Download Slide Deck

WG Status at a Glance

First-round CD comment periods are closed; the Compilation of Comments (CC) now drives edits in each WG. Expect a first wave of CD2s planned for early Dec 2025 after the Nov 2025 Milan work week, and a second wave following the Apr 2026 Shanghai meetings around Jun 2026. Stay current with CDs and CCs — or engage experts — because changes here will flow into design inputs, QMS, labeling/IFUs, V&V, and documentation.

9 things RA/QA leaders must know

One-Pager

Sean Smith captured nine essentials from the webinar (timestamps included):

1. Scope & Essential Performance; the boundaries for design, testing and compliance
2. Use Environments & Users; usability files and IFUs must match
3. Software Requirements Expanded; PEMS, SaMD, SIMD now covered
4. Collaterals Integrated; 1,000+ pages, one-stop standard
5. QMS Impact Areas; labeling, ISO 20417 reliance
6. EMC & Wireless Coexistence; higher RF fields, coexistence testing
7. Regulator Participation & Timeline; April 2030 + transition window
8. Hardware & Documentation Updates; alarms, usability, labeling, V&V
9. Immediate Actions; build an impact register, update labeling, begin EMC testing

The webinar replay

Watch Webinar

The replay provides the why — why regulators are focusing on scope and user environments, how expanded software/PEMS requirements shift the burden of evidence, and why wireless coexistence is no longer optional outside the US.

The summary article

Summary Article

This article organizes the hour-long webinar into a reference that RA/QA leaders and design managers can use to pinpoint pain points to focus on to avoid the fire drills of last-minute planning.

How to use this survival kit

1. Kick off a cross-functional session using the one-pager as the agenda
2. Watch replay segments together (software, EMC, labeling, etc.)
3. Assign owners for each of the 12 hazard Working Groups across RA/QA, Design, Test
4. Use the article as a quick reference to keep momentum
5. Track WG outputs and rely on your internal or external experts

one-pager for overview, the replay for context, the article for detail, and the slide deck for depth give your team a GPS starting point for 4th Edition readiness.

How We Can Help

If your team needs help mapping the 4th Edition into your design controls, QMS, labeling, or testing strategy, my team at Eisner Safety Consultants and I are ready to support you.

Schedule a call with me, Leo, the IEC 601 Guy

Keep the Conversation Going

• Join the LinkedIn conversation around the replay post and comments — replay post and comments
• See the earlier discussion thread and join the discussion: Major changes to IEC 60601-1, 4th Ed. are closer than you think
• Explore more insights on my blog or listen to past podcasts

Impacts on IEC 60601-1, 4th Ed. – Webinar Recap and Industry Reactions

Insights from 110+ MedTech professionals on the upcoming 4th Edition and its impact on design controls, QMS, and labeling.

Video Replay Download Slides Schedule a Call

On August 15, 2025, I had the privilege of presenting the Impacts on IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition webinar as part of MLVx Friday In-Focus. The turnout was incredible, with more than 110 MedTech professionals from around the world joining. Startups, SMEs, large manufacturers, test labs, and regulators were all represented.

We unpacked the drivers and major changes in the upcoming 4th Edition, and the discussion didn’t stop when the webinar ended. Some of the most valuable insights came afterward in the LinkedIn conversations that followed.

See the replay post and comments here on LinkedIn
And the prior post: Major changes to IEC 60601-1, 4th Ed. are closer than you think

What the Industry Is Talking About

From the comments and follow-up conversations, four major themes stood out:

• SME vs Large Corp Burden – Smaller companies worry the 4th Edition requirements could hit them harder than large corporations with more resources.
• National & International Committee Involvement – Many are realizing that participating in standards development, even at the national level, gives manufacturers a seat at the table. Being involved internationally is even more powerful if you can swing it.
• Rationale Behind Requirements – The Design Specification requires a rationale for each requirement of the standard. This is not fully addressed in Ed. 3.2, so the change should help improve industry understanding of the standard going forward.
• Impacts on Design Controls, QMS, and Labeling – These changes are not just “paper exercises.” They will reshape how manufacturers approach design controls, QMS integration, and labeling processes across the entire product lifecycle.

Replay Video

If you missed the live session or want to revisit the details, here’s the full webinar replay:

Download the slides here

Why This Matters

As the IEC 601 Guy, I’ve been deeply involved in the development of IEC 60601-1, not just for this edition but also for the previous edition. The 4th Edition is shaping up to be one of the most impactful yet, especially in how it connects to design controls, supplier oversight, and QMS processes.

Conversations like these are important because they highlight the real-world concerns of manufacturers, regulators, and test labs. They help ensure implementation of the standard is proactive, not reactive.

How We Can Help

If your team needs help mapping these 4th Edition changes into your design controls, QMS, or testing strategy, my team at Eisner Safety Consultants and I are here to support you.

Schedule a call with me, Leo, the IEC 601 Guy. My team & I are here to support your needs.

Keep the Conversation Going

Standards only evolve when industry voices are active. I encourage you to:

• Join the LinkedIn conversation: Replay post + comments
• See the earlier discussion thread: Major changes to IEC 60601-1, 4th Ed. are closer than you think
• Explore more insights on my blog: Standards Updates or see my previous Podcasts

Together, we can make sure these changes lead to safer devices, smoother regulatory pathways, and stronger compliance strategies.

Once the 4th Edition is published, redesigns and QMS updates will be far more costly.

Direct insights from someone in the development of IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition

Get an insider’s view of the upcoming changes, their real-world impact, and how to prepare, from someone directly involved in developing the standard.

Event Recap – MLVx Friday In-Focus

On Friday, August 15, the MLVx Friday In-Focus with Sean Smith brought together Leonard (Leo) Eisner, The IEC 60601 Guy, and 110+ professionals from around the globe, including the UK, Romania, US, France, Switzerland, Germany, Finland, and Pakistan, representing medtech manufacturers, regulators, test houses, and standards developers.

We focused on the impact of IEC 60601-1, 4th Edition, the global standard that defines safety and essential performance for medical electrical equipment, and what’s coming that many companies are still not prepared for.

The highlight was an impromptu expert panel with leaders in risk management, software, cybersecurity, regulatory submissions, and combination devices. Together, we tackled questions from every angle, sharing real-world insights on design, testing, and compliance challenges. The discussion showed exactly what’s possible when top experts collaborate to help the industry prepare for disruptive change.

(Full presentation available for download at the bottom of this post.)

Unlock Your IEC 60601-1 Insider Advantage

• Mitigate Risks: Spot disruptive changes early, prevent costly redesigns, and align documentation ahead of competitors
• Accelerated Compliance: Seamlessly integrate evolving requirements into your development pipeline
• Leadership Insight: The IEC 60601 Guy and our expert team track areas of interest for your organization based on draft documents
• Behind Closed Doors: Access knowledge while it’s still being developed
• Ready to Leap Ahead? Let’s turn this insider pipeline into your 4th Edition fast-track

+1-503-709-8328
EisnerSafety.com
Schedule a Free 30-Minute Web Meeting

If you missed the live session, this recap and presentation will help you understand what’s coming — and more importantly, how to prepare.

Free presentation in London — With Leo Eisner, The60601Guy, & Ian Sealey

𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘂?

• Some 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 of IEC60601-1 , 4th being considered you 𝙢𝙖𝙮 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩:
Gas Pathways,
Cleaning,
Disinfection,
AI/ML,
Voice Input/Output,
Adhesives for Applied Parts,
PPE,
and so much more….

• IEC60601-1 , 4th Ed.
• Applicable Standards
• Future Proofing Test Plans

IEC 60601-1, 4th edition is currently in development and there are some SIGNIFICANT changes underway.

Ian Sealey, Michael Kipping, James Pink and I, Leonard (Leo) Eisner, The60601Guy, will be discussing the changes, indicative timescales, and how to plan for them.

𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻, 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲, 𝗵𝗼𝘄:
7 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 2024
𝘊𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘵𝘰𝘯 𝘏𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘭 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘸𝘪𝘤𝘬
𝘈𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘭 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝟱:𝟬𝟬𝙥𝙢
𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝟱:𝟯𝟬𝙥𝙢
𝘌𝘯𝘥 𝟴:𝟰𝟱𝙥𝙢
𝙉𝙚𝙩𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙙𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙠𝙨 afterwards

TICK TOCK – Time is starting to run out for signing up for this event. If you wait too long there won’t be room so sign up now before we fill up. Don’t wait tooooooo long and miss this great opportunity to learn from experts.

Register by using our Contact form, send Leo an email (go to bottom of page) or send Leo a LinkedIn message via his profile.

Join the conversation on the LinkedIn Post and leave a comment.

Learn from an 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 that wrote portions of 𝗜𝗘𝗖 𝟲𝟬𝟲𝟬𝟭-𝟭, 𝗲𝗱 𝟯.𝟮 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 and is involved in the development of the Fourth Edition of IEC 60601-1. If you want to learn about these updates to the standard and the IEC 60601 Amendments Project – You’re in luck – Leonard (Leo) Eisner the “𝗜𝗘𝗖 𝟲𝟬𝟲𝟬𝟭 𝗚𝘂𝘆” from Eisner Safety Consultants partnered with Holly Rossington of BSI to present the webinar “Leveraging the CB Scheme: A Guide for North American Medical Device Manufacturers”

We answered some of the most pressing questions, such as:
• How North American medical device manufacturers can leverage the CB scheme and its benefits.
• Examples of medical devices BSI can certify.
• Key changes introduced in the latest edition of IEC 60601-1 (Ed. 3.2):
o Clause 7, Identification and marking.
o Clause 8, Protection against electrical hazards.
o Clause 13, Hazardous situations and fault conditions.
And lots more.

Watch to the end to get other valuable resources too!!!

Need help with 60601 series standards (Medical Electrical Equipment) including EMC; training to 3rd or 4th edition; strategic planning for your medical electrical product lines; need support when FDA or a regulator asks questions for a submission Eisner Safety Consultants experts deal with EU, US, & other country regulatory requirements & standards, laws, directives, and more. Leo Eisner is an expert on standards development and sits on many standards committees. He also has experts on additional standards committees and we all talk to the regulators. He has a team of experts to support your needs.

We work with many test labs for Medical Electrical Safety & EMC and can arrange other testing, as well. Please let us know if we can help when you contact us.

Feel free to schedule a meeting Leo or contact Leo at Leo@EisnerSafety.com or through our contact form.

Webinar: Leveraging the CB Scheme: A Guide for North American Medical Device Manufacturers

When: Tuesday, June 25, 2024  

Time: 11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. EDT 

About the Event: Join BSI & Leo Eisner for an insightful webinar that explores how North American medical device manufacturers can harness the power of the CB Scheme to enhance their global market access. Leo the “IEC 60601-1 Guy” will present the significant updates introduced in the latest edition of IEC 60601-1 Ed. 3.2, which will impact medical device manufacturers.

Sign up for this webinar

Need help with 60601 series standards (Medical Electrical Equipment) including EMC; training to 3rd or 4th edition; strategic planning for your medical electrical product lines; need support when FDA or a regulator asks questions for a submission Eisner Safety Consultants experts deal with EU, US, & other country regulatory requirements & standards, laws, directives, and more. Leo Eisner is an expert on standards development and sits on many standards committees. He also has experts on additional standards committees and we all talk to the regulators. He has a team of experts to support your needs.

We work with many test labs for Medical Electrical Safety & EMC and can arrange other testing, as well. Please let us know if we can help when you contact us.

Feel free to schedule a call with Leo or contact Leo at Leo@EisnerSafety.com or through our contact form.

Joe Hage graciously invited me to present on July 30 to his MDG premium group on “IEC 60601 Amendments & What’s in the future for Medical Electrical Equipment”. We had a great conversation with about 35 or so people from around the world. They were from Ireland, the Netherlands, India, the US, and elsewhere in the conversation, with questions throughout and at the end too.

I included some new information about the FDA ASCA Pilot Program (new lab info) and also some about the status of some of the Amendment standards and where the US and EU standards are at in terms of adoption.

Enjoy the presentation. It’s at https://youtu.be/yS0xfFX0VpU – MDG Premium’s special YouTube Channel

By the way I recently joined the MDG premium group and you should too. It’s a great way to meet others in the industry and trade ideas and ask questions of experts in the field.

Need help with the IEC 60601 Amendments, work thru strategic planning for your medical electrical product lines, need support when FDA or a regulator ask questions for a submission Eisner Safety Consultants experts deal with EU, US, & other country regulatory requirements & standards, laws, directives, and more. Leo Eisner is an expert on standards development and sits on many standards committees. Feel free to schedule a call with Leo www.EisnerSafety.com/Schedule-Call/ or contact Leo at Leo@EisnerSafety.com or through our contact form at https://eisnersafety.com/contact_eisner_safety/.

This amendment is multifaceted and will introduce many new changes to the symbol requirements that medical device organizations around the world will be expected to follow.

The 4th Edition of ISO 15223-1 will include 25 additional symbols in total, newly defined terms and removal of existing terms as well as inclusion of terms from other standards, and expansion of the informative annex containing examples—just to name a few.

Understanding the new requirements of ISO 15223-1 4th Edition and the intent behind these major changes will be a critically urgent task for both medical device manufacturers and organizations operating within the medical device supply chain.

This free, in-depth webinar will be presented by one of the industry’s most knowledgeable experts on this topic, Leo Eisner, a committee member of ISO/TC 210/WG 3 (ISO 15223-1). Attendees will learn about the latest updates to this key international standard, understand the full scope of changes to the ISO 15223-1 4th Edition, and uncover actionable ways to easily and effectively transition to compliance with the new requirements.

SPECIFICALLY THIS WEBINAR WILL COVER:

• Summary of what’s changing from the 3rd to 4th Edition of ISO 15223-1
• Details about revisions to scope and introduction
• Explanation of defined terms that have been added and removed from amended version
• New symbols included in the 4th Edition
• Overview of the expansion of informative annex containing examples
• Q&A session

WHO SHOULD ATTEND?

• Design and Development Engineers and Management
• Regulatory Affairs Professionals and Management
• Quality Professionals and Management
• Medical Device Labeling, Packaging, and Distribution Firms
• Clinical Affairs Professionals and Management
• Medical Device Executives