{"id":2012,"date":"2011-01-29T05:29:35","date_gmt":"2011-01-29T05:29:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/?p=2012"},"modified":"2011-01-29T05:29:35","modified_gmt":"2011-01-29T05:29:35","slug":"health-canada-revised-significant-change-interpretation-guidance-doc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/2011\/01\/29\/health-canada-revised-significant-change-interpretation-guidance-doc\/","title":{"rendered":"Health Canada Revised Significant Change Interpretation Guidance Doc"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: small;\">On January 20, 2011 Health Canada issued a notice in regard to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eisnersafety.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/01\/GUIDANCE-DOC-Interpretation-of-Sig-Chng-JAN-05-111.pdf\">&#8220;Guidance for the Interpretation of Significant Change of a Medical Device&#8221;<\/a>. \u00a0This newly released guidance document replaces the previous 2003 guidance document. \u00a0The date of revision for this document \u00a0is January 5, 2011 and the effective date, is a April 1, 2011. This guidance document includes updated examples of significant change and has been reformatted into Good Guidance Practices (GGP) format. \u00a0In this new guidance document it provides a three-phased assessment tool that includes: 1) general principles in identifying a significant change; 2) a series of nine flowcharts ( \u201cMain Flowchart\u201d, Flowcharts A to H) to aid in decision making; 3) and a fairly detailed list of significant and non-significant change examples. \u00a0The list \u00a0for significant \u00a0and non-significant changes includes: changes in manufacturing processes, facility or equipment; changes in design; changes in material; changes to labeling; changes to sterilization; and changes to software. The notice is repeated in full below:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 13px; padding-left: 30px; \"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Health Canada is pleased to announce the release of the <\/span><em><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Guidance for the Interpretation of Significant Changes<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-size: small;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 13px; padding-left: 30px; \"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">The <\/span><em><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Medical Devices Regulations<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-size: small;\"> (Regulations) set out the requirements governing the sale, importation and advertisement of medical devices. The goal of the Regulations is to ensure that medical devices offered for sale in Canada are safe and effective and meet quality standards. Class II, III and IV medical devices sold in Canada are required to be licensed under section 26 of the Regulations. Section 34 of the Regulations describes five instances when a manufacturer is obliged to apply for an amended medical device licence. One of those instances is when a &#8220;significant change&#8221; is proposed to a Class III or IV device.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px; \"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">This guidance document elaborates upon the definition of &#8220;significant change&#8221; in the Regulations, in order to assist manufacturers in determining whether a change proposed to a class III or IV medical device requires the submission to Health Canada of a licence amendment application, prior to introducing the device to the market.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 13px; padding-left: 30px; \"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">This guidance document will replace the 2003 <\/span><em><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Guidance for the Interpretation of Significant Change of a Medical Device<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-size: small;\">. The major changes include updated examples of significant changes and a restructuring of the guidance for additional clarity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px; \"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">For further information on the revised Guidance for Industry: Guidance for the Interpretation of Significant Change of a Medical Device, please contact:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 66px; \"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Manager, Device Evaluation Division<br \/>\n Medical Devices Bureau<br \/>\n Therapeutic Products Directorate<br \/>\n Health Canada<br \/>\n Room 1605 Main Building<br \/>\n 150 Tunney&#8217;s Pasture Driveway<br \/>\n Address Locator: 0301H1<br \/>\n Ottawa, Ontario<br \/>\n K1A 0K9<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 13px; padding-left: 66px; \"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Email: <\/span><a style=\"color: #663366; \" href=\"mailto:MDB_enquiries@hc-sc.gc.ca\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">MDB_enquiries@hc-sc.gc.ca<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: small;\"><br \/>\n Phone: (613) 957-7285<br \/>\n Fax: (613) 957-6345<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On January 20, 2011 Health Canada issued a notice in regard to the &#8220;Guidance for the Interpretation of Significant Change of a Medical Device&#8221;. \u00a0This newly released guidance document replaces the previous 2003 guidance document. \u00a0The date of revision for<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[194,100,290],"class_list":["post-2012","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-guidance-documents","tag-health-canada","tag-significant-change"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2012","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2012"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2012\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eisnersafety.com\/eisnersafetycom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}