<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>european parliament &#8211; Eisner Safety Consultants</title>
	<atom:link href="https://eisnersafety.com/tag/european-parliament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://eisnersafety.com</link>
	<description>Regulatory &#38; Safety Experts for Global Medical Device Approvals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Where is EU headed with Proposed Medical Device Regulations by ENVI?</title>
		<link>https://eisnersafety.com/2013/09/27/where-is-eu-headed-with-proposed-medical-device-regulations-by-envi/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=where-is-eu-headed-with-proposed-medical-device-regulations-by-envi</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leoeisner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIMDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDRH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class iib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies in europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVI Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESCNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eucamed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eucamed Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europa Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european medical device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fierce Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Healthcare Environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Use Med Dvcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MASS Device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MD&DI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MD&DI Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDD Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device & Diagnostic Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device & Diagnostic Industries Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Academy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical device companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical device manufacturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical device manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notified Body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAPS Regulatory Focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAPS RF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time to market]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisnersafety.com/eisnersafetycom/?p=3474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The answer seems to be in the direction of a US FDA Style review process for some higher class devices (Class IIb &#38; III) which means longer time to market and more hurdles to get past for these types of]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">The answer seems to be in the direction of a US FDA Style review process for some higher class devices (Class IIb &amp; III) which means longer time to market and more hurdles to get past for these types of devices.  Note, this issue is not set in stone and you should read some of the detailed analysis on this topic so you are able to plan for these changes (such as start on a &#8220;living&#8221; quality plan so you are more prepared when the time comes that you will need to take required actions).<span id="more-3474"></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">This could have a huge impact on the EU market place including the patients, medical device manufacturers (especially the smaller medical device companies), and put jobs at risk, as well.  See the <strong><a href="http://bit.ly/Eucamedsurvey" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">article from Eucamed on a survey they did of medical device companies in Europe</a></strong> to get an idea of the costs involved with these proposed changes.  On 25 Sept 2013 Eucamed said they expressed &#8220;&#8230;disappointment and strong concern at the outcome of a vote in the European Parliament’s Committee for Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI)&#8230;.&#8221; in their Article titled<strong> <a href="http://bit.ly/EucamedRushedDeals" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rushed deal leaves patient and jobs in second place</a></strong>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">There are several sources I rely on a regular basis to keep up to date on this changing landscape and the next two websites are some of my favorite blogs as they have very reliable information that is on point, sometimes they will even make a predication here or there (with decent odds of being right, but not always) and always helpful for the medical device manufacturer.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">The first of the 2 websites I read regularly is <strong><a href="http://bit.ly/MedDvcAcademy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Medical Device Academy</a></strong>.  The <a href="http://bit.ly/EUMedDvcRegNxtSteps" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>article provides analysis and</strong><strong> interpretation of how the EU took the next step in approving the proposed medical device regulations</strong></a>. This article covers a lot of ground including the <strong><a href="http://bit.ly/EUCommPressRlsNBs" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">EU Commission Press Release</a> </strong>about two new documents in relation to Notified Bodies, Eucamed&#8217;s Political Positioning, Next Steps in the Proposed Medical Device Regulations Approval Process (important to read), and lastly Why is there a Rush?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">The second website I am always checking up on is <strong><a href="http://bit.ly/MedDvcsLgl" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">MedicalDeviceslegal</a></strong> written by a lawyer that works at a boutique life sciences law firm Axon Lawyers located in the Netherlands who is able to keep a really good pulse of the industry and the development of these types of regulations, laws, directives, and such.  He has written many articles on this specific subject and has been following the process closely.  His latest article indicates that the <strong><a href="http://bit.ly/MedDvcsLglENVIVoteWorst" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&#8220;ENVI vote result worst of all worlds&#8221;</a>.   </strong>He gives you the bad news straight up.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Other resources I rely on a pretty regular basis that also have articles on this subject are: </span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong><a href="http://bit.ly/RAPSRegFocus" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">RAPS Regulatory Focus</a></strong> which has 2 articles for today 26 Sept 2013 on the subject:</span></li>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong><a href="http://bit.ly/RAPSRegFocusEUParlimntMedDvcProps" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">European Parliament Passes Landmark Medical Device, IVD Reform Proposals</a></strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"><strong><a href="http://bit.ly/RAPSRegFocusEUCommCEMking" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">European Commission Strengthens Oversight of CE-Marking Process</a></strong></span></li>
</ul>
<li><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"><strong><a href="http://bit.ly/MASSDvc" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">MASS DEVICE</a> </strong>article I saw today on the topic but with other related articles from other days:</span></li>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"><a href="http://bit.ly/MASSDvcEUApprvFDALikeMedRqrts" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>EU panel approves FDA-like requirements for medical devices</strong></a></span></li>
</ul>
<li><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"><strong><a href="http://bit.ly/FierceMed" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fierce Medical Devices</a></strong> one article I saw today but with other related articles from other times:</span></li>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;"><strong><a href="http://bit.ly/FierceMedEUCommBacksToughUSStyleSys" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">EU committee backs tougher, U.S.-style device approval system</a></strong></span></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<div><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">Another resource I like that didn&#8217;t seem to have any current articles on the subject is:</span></span></div>
<div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="http://bit.ly/mddimag" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>Medical Device &amp; Diagnostic Industries (MD&amp;DI)</strong></a></span></li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of the Draft report on the EU MDD proposed regulations</title>
		<link>https://eisnersafety.com/2013/04/30/impact-of-the-draft-report-on-the-eu-mdd-proposed-regulations/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=impact-of-the-draft-report-on-the-eu-mdd-proposed-regulations</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leoeisner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIMDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDRH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE marking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESCNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eucomed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in vitro diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notified Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notified Body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post marketing surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapporteur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unnecessary delays]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisnersafety.com/eisnersafetycom/?p=3291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This post is based on the Impact of the Draft report on the EU MDD proposed regulations and comes from posts, opinion pieces and stories from MedTech Europe, Eucomed &#38; Erik Vollebregt (medicaldeviceslegal.com) If you are reading this post my guess]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">This post is based on the Impact of the Draft report on the EU MDD proposed regulations and comes from posts, opinion pieces and stories from MedTech Europe, Eucomed &amp; Erik Vollebregt (<strong><a href="http://www.medicaldeviceslegal.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">medicaldeviceslegal.com</a></strong>)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">If you are reading this post my guess is you already know the proposed MDD regulations are contentious and that there is some major changes proposed some good and some not so good. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><span id="more-3291"></span>The later occurred a couple weeks ago when the <strong><a href="http://www.eisnersafety.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Draft-rprt-from-Dagmar-Roth-Behrendt-12Apr2013-on-MDD-regulation-proposal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rapporteur Mrs. Roth-Behrendt proposed in a draft report for the MDD regulations</a></strong>.  As Eucomed states “The draft report is a step backward for patients, healthcare systems and Europe.”  The reason is the report calls for “a shift towards a centralised pre-market authorisation system which if carried through to the final legal text will confront patient in Europe with unnecessary delays of lifesaving medical devices reaching them without improving safety.”  The system would create a “enormous bureaucratic system with no benefits.”   Note, this is not a final report so there is a ways to go before we know if this will be finalized as is or modified. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">To get more information and perspective from these organizations please read on the posts and articles: <strong><a href="http://medicaldeviceslegal.com/2013/04/15/hold-on-to-your-seat-envis-dagmar-roth-beherndt-report-is-here/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Erik Vollebregt excellent article on the draft report detailing what the changes are</a></strong>; <a href="http://medicaldeviceslegal.com/2013/04/24/guest-blog-no-enhanced-patient-safety-resulting-from-rapporteur-roth-beherndts-proposal/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>a Guest blog post on Erik Vollebregt medicaldeviceslegal website titled “no enhanced patient safety resulting from rapporteur Roth-Behrendt’s proposal”</strong>;</a> <strong><a href="http://www.eucomed.org/newsroom/108/57/No-surprises-in-draft-report-on-medical-devices-from-Rapporteur-Roth-Behrendt?cntnt01homepage=yes&amp;cntnt01origid=103" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eucomed’s position and understanding of the Rapporteur ‘s draft report</a></strong>; <strong><a href="http://www.medtecheurope.org/blogposts/155/40/blog/2013/04/24/Getting-regulation-right-for-in-vitro-diagnostics-and-medical-devices" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a blog post by the CEO of MedTech Europe, EDMA, &amp; Eucomed in regard to draft report for the MDD</a></strong>; <strong><a href="http://www.medtecheurope.org/newsletternews/204/86" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">MedTech Europe story on “European Parliament’s ENVI Committee releases draft reports on MDD and IVDD</a></strong>; and <strong><a href="http://www.eucomed.org/key-themes/medical-devices-directives/the-eu-system-for-medical-devices" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Where the EU system for medical devices is and needs to go</a></strong>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">We hope these articles help you understand where the process stands and help you form your own opinions.  From there where you go is up to you but know we will keep sending you updates on this process as we find relevant information to pass on as this process is critical to the survival of the European Medical Device Market.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 Step Closer to EU Medical Device e-Labeling</title>
		<link>https://eisnersafety.com/2012/01/17/1-step-closer-to-eu-medical-device-e-labeling/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=1-step-closer-to-eu-medical-device-e-labeling</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leoeisner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIMDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic IFU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Instructions for Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eucomed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eisnersafety.com/eisnersafetycom/?p=2270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Per Eucomed&#8217;s  7 October 2011 newsletter electronic labeling of medical devices (MDD &#38; AIMDD) has been approved as a draft regulation and is in the hands of &#8220;the Council and European Parliament who will have 3 months to exercise their]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">Per <a href="http://www.eucomed.org/newsletternews/196/124/news/2011/10/07/Electronic-labelling-of-medical-devices-a-boon-for-people-s-safety-accuracy-of-instructions-and-environment/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eucomed&#8217;s  7 October 2011 newsletter electronic labeling of medical devices</a> (MDD &amp; AIMDD) has been approved as a draft regulation and is in the hands of &#8220;the Council and European Parliament who will have 3 months to exercise their right of scrutiny and evaluate whether the European Commission has exceeded its powers with this proposed regulation.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">Final publication and entry into force is expected at the beginning of 2012.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
