COMMISSION IMPLEMENTATION DECISION M/575 was issued 14 April 2021: This is a list of standards the EU Commission is hoping to Harmonize under MDR and IVDR.  One of the issues is the HAS consultant has issued a negative assessment on EN ISO 14971 which the CEN/CLC JTC3 leadership is working with the HAS consultant to address the issues and to draft acceptable European annexes so Harmonization can occur for the standard.  Many of the standards on the list in M/575 reference to EN ISO 14971 so it is highly likely that CEN and CENELEC will reject this newest version of the EU Commission Standardization Request again and we won’t have any Harmonized Standards by the Date of Application (26 May 2021) for the MDR which will cause lots of problems for manufacturers and Notified Bodies and cause more delays for the MDR & likely even for the IVDR I’m sorry to say.  Also, the MDCG 2021-5 “Guidance on standardisation for medical devices” doesn’t seem to clarify when harmonized standards are not published through the Offical Journal of the EU what to do.  In section 3.1 mentions Harmonized standards are voluntary with respect to the MDR & IVDR as they were for the MDD, AIMDD, & IVDD.  The closest the MDCG gets to it is to use the “State of Art” standards approach in section 3.5.

Another important observation is all the newest versions of the General & Collateral IEC 60601 Standards that were issued Summer of 2020 (EN versions were issued later in the year) are listed in Annex I of the EU Commission Standardization Request as the deadline to adopt these standards by 27 May 2024 — These are EN 60601-1, ed. 3.2; EN 60601-1-2, ed. 4.1; EN 60601-1-3, ed. 2.2; EN 60601-1-6, ed. 3.2; EN 60601-1-8, ed. 2.2; EN 60601-1-9, ed. 1.2; EN 60601-1-10, ed. 1.2; EN 60601-1-11, ed. 2.1; & EN 60601-1-12, ed. 1.1 – The Particular Standards EN 60601-2-XX or EN ISO 80601-2-XX listed are primarily based on the previous versions of the General & Collaterals of IEC 60601 standards on the M/575 list so this will likely cause conflicts vs the listed new standards mentioned here.

Follow the full discussion and updates to this post on LinkedIn

Confused this is what Eisner Safety Consultants experts deal with all the time for countries for these and many other standards, regulations, laws, directives, and more. Leo Eisner is an expert on standards development and sit on many standards committees. Let us help you through this process. Need help with Essential Performance. Feel free to schedule a call with Leo www.EisnerSafety.com/Schedule-Call/ or contact Leo at Leo@EisnerSafety.com or through our contact form at https://eisnersafety.com/contact_eisner_safety/.

We strive at Eisner Safety Consultants (ESC) to provide the best services for our clients and we have found one that is ideal for many of our small to mid size medical device companies we work with.  greenlight.guru produces an electronic Quality Management System (eQMS) solution built exclusively for medical device companies that is:

• Simple to use,
• integrated product development activities with quality processes,
• is hosted in a secure cloud environment,
• is easy to deploy,
• your team can be spread out all over the world & be able to work on the same documents without any lapse or issues of communication,
• provides easy to use project management tools,
• consolidates your documents into one system,
• helps coordinate your design process into a visual based system that is easy to follow,
• helps fulfill the requirements of ISO 13485, 21 CFR Part 820, and ISO 14971 (& EN 14971),
• has an easy to use document control process,
• and so much more,

This solution will help you ensure compliance, reduce risk and improve team collaboration from the idea stage all the way through post market commercialization. With greenlight.guru’s powerful, easy to use eQMS solution, and Eisner Safety Consultants expertise we will help medical device companies navigate the ever shifting regulatory, quality systems, and product safety environments, enabling them to bring higher quality life changing devices to market, faster – which, after all, is our mission.

To find out more about greenlight.guru please contact Leo Eisner at Leo@EisnerSafety.com or call us at 503-244-6151 or go to our Partners page. We would be happy to discuss the product with you and set you up for a demonstration of the greenlight.guru eQMS solution so you can test drive it to see if it is the right fit for your company.

Just released as of June 25, 2014 this NBRG Consensus Paper for the Interpretation and Application of Annexes Z in EN ISO 14971:2012 is finally available.  Be forewarned that the document is not yet adopted by the NBRG, which can only be done at the next Meeting in October 2014.  Hopefully it will be adopted at that meeting.  I will check in with my NBRG Risk Management Working Group contacts to find out if they know more about that issue.

But let’s take this chance to review a little about the document and the history of the EN ISO 14971:2012 Annex Z’s.  Future posts will get into more details. The following 3 paragraphs come straight from the introduction of the document as the Working Group summarizes the situation really well.  I happen to know a couple of these working group members personally and I know they have a very good handle on the situation and they have provided some very good background.  

In October 2010, the regular review of ISO 14971:2007 which is the basis of EN ISO 14971:2009 was closed by a broad majority of votes confirming the existing status and the wide-spread acceptance of this standard in the medical devices community, including competent authorities. In November 2010, the European Commission raised a formal objection against the use of several harmonized standards, including EN ISO 14971, followed by an in-depth assessment of the coverage of the Essential Requirements of the Medical Device Directives (90/385/EEC, 93/42/EEC and 98/79/EC) by these standards.

As a result of these objections, the Annexes Z to EN ISO 14971 were modified, resulting in EN ISO 14971:2012. This amendment of the EN ISO 14971 standard did not modify the normative parts of ISO 14971:20071. The Annexes Z describe the extent of presumption of conformity that can be based on application of the normative requirements of ISO 14971 alone. The “content deviations”, expressed in the revised Annexes Z, between ISO 14971:2007 and the Medical Device Directives have been commented by many experts in the field of risk management and resulted in diverging interpretations from different stakeholders (e.g. manufacturers, notified bodies, competent authorities).

This document has been prepared as a Notified Body Consensus Paper by a working group headed by the NBRG Vice Chair, with representatives from several European Notified Bodies and industry associations COCIR, Eucomed, EDMA and ZVEI. The paper aims to provide a practical interpretation of these “content deviations” to the Medical Device Directives and give guidance as to how to implement the risk management requirements. The work consolidates prior publications of various sources and is intended to facilitate common understanding between industry and Notified Bodies.

If you would like further info on the consensus document and some history please check out the previous posts below (Latest to Oldest):

• MD&DI Article “Collaboration Holds the Key to Clarity on EN ISO 14971:2012”

• NBRG Consensus Document on EN ISO 14971:2012 Is On Its Way MD&M West ’14 Presentation 

• NBRG Call for Industry Participation – Survey Understanding Annex Z EN ISO 14971:2012

This post is a status update on the NBRG RMWG Risk Management Consensus Document

30 April 2014 – The NBRG (Notified Body Recommendation Group) Risk Management Working Group (RMWG) membership will have a face to face meeting in mid May to refine the draft Consensus document on EN ISO 14971:2012.  This meeting has come about because the NBRG RMWG received some feedback recently from the EU Commission and they will consider it and roll it into this document.

The consensus document’s purpose is to reduce the confusion around the EU Harmonized Standard EN ISO 14971:2012 Annexes ZA, ZB, & ZC that amends the EN ISO 14971:2009 version of the standard to align with the 3 Medical Devices Directives (the Medical Device, Active Implantable Medical Device, and In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directives). The previous plan was to have this Consensus document completed and released by Mid to Late April ’14 but at this point it is hoped the NBRG RMWG will have a final released document by the end of June 2014. We look forward to sending good news about the progress of this document over the next month or so.

If you would like further info on the consensus document and some history please check out the previous posts below (Latest to Oldest):

• MD&DI Article “Collaboration Holds the Key to Clarity on EN ISO 14971:2012”
• NBRG Consensus Document on EN ISO 14971:2012 Is On Its Way MD&M West ’14 Presentation
• NBRG Call for Industry Participation – Survey Understanding Annex Z EN ISO 14971:2012

The NBRG (Notified Body Recommendation Group) Risk Management Working Group is working to put together a consensus document.  A call to industry has been sent out to ask for participation in a survey on how your risk management system aligns with EN ISO 14971:2012 that will help in the direction of this consensus document so please take part in it.  Read the article for more details and a post that links to the survey.

Past posts on this subject include:

• NBRG Consensus Document on EN ISO 14971:2012 Is On Its Way MD&M West ’14 Presentation
• NBRG Call for Industry Participation – Survey Understanding Annex Z EN ISO 14971:2012

If you need help with Risk Management with respect to the IEC 60601 series of Standards, email Leo Eisner directly at Leo@EisnerSafety.com, or call Leo at +1-(503)-244-6151. He is the Principal Consultant of Eisner Safety Consultants (bit.ly/EisnerSafetyConsultants).

The live link to the survey is on the fourth set of pages on slide deck and is slide 8 of the presentation.  The more participants in the survey the more likely your voices will be heard and we hope this will improve the potential outcome of the process.

On 8 February we posted the NBRG letter which was a Call for Industry Participation in the Survey on Understanding Annex Z of EN ISO 14971:2012. 

[slideshare id=32021997&doc=mdmwestpresentationonnbrgconsensusdocumentoneniso14971201211feb2014-140306235842-phpapp01&type=d]

On 7 February 2014 the Vice Chair of the Notified Body Recommendation Group, Michael Bothe, sent out a letter to industry to ask for their participation in a short survey (about 10 minutes long) to help the Notified Bodies understand what are industry’s current practices when it comes to conducting Risk Management Process on their medical devices and IVD’s and how it relates to EN ISO 14971:2012.  As the letter says it is to “attempt to develop a practical interpretation on how to use and implement Risk Management in the context of the European Medical Devices Directives, more specifically the European version of ISO 14971:2007, as published in EN ISO 14971:2012.”

Please join in on this survey, as the more participation the more representative the data will be to the Notified Bodies and hopefully this will make for a better Consensus Document on EN ISO 14971:2012 Risk Management Process.  Please complete your survey responses by 21 March 2014.

To find out more about what is going on with this proposed Consensus Document please join me, Leo Eisner as the track chair for Improving Risk Management Strategies and Procedures, at the MD&M West conference on Tuesday 11 February 2014, as I discuss how we got to this point and what is hopefully going to culminate in a Consensus Document on Risk Management with regard to EN ISO 14971:2012.

If you have questions about this topic or need help with compliance with your Medical products you can e-mail Leo Eisner at Leo@EisnerSafety.com directly or call Leo at 503-244-6151.  Leo is the Principal Consultant of Eisner Safety Consultants.

To kick-off the morning for our track I will be talking briefly on a draft document that NB-MED & COCIR & some other organizations are working on to help clarify what is expected of medical device manufacturers when relying on EN ISO 14971:2012 which is a document that has totally muddied the waters.

I am in direct contact with the authors of this consensus based document and we are working on finalizing what I will be presenting to you at the conference. So, expect some up to the date information about this document and we may be asking for feedback from industry too.  Stay tuned for any updates to this post too.  I look forward to presenting this material to the conference participants.

If you need help with the Risk Management File concepts within the IEC 60601 series of Standards, email Leo Eisner directly at Leo@EisnerSafety.com, or call Leo at +1-(503)-244-6151. Leo is the Principal Consultant of Eisner Safety Consultants (bit.ly/EisnerSafetyConsultants).

BIG News!!!  News, I have been waiting for many years now is that OSHA, finally, under it’s NRTL (Nationally Recognized Test Lab) program will be adding the US National version of the IEC 60601-1:05 + A1:12 medical electrical safety standard (= AAMI ES 60601-1:05/(R):12 + A1:12 + C1:09/(R):12 + A2:10/(R):12) to their ‘List of Appropriate’ NRTL Program Test Standards.  The announcement in the Federal Register is dated for 25 November 2013 but the list won’t be updated until at least early next year as comments, information, & documents in response to the notice, or requests for extension of time to make a submission are due by 26 December 2013.

What’s that mean to those manufacturers that have been waiting years to get a NRTL US Mark for their medical electrical product to 3rd ed. of 60601-1?  It means that OSHA is just announcing they are adding this standard to the ‘list of Appropriate Standards’ sometime early next year, if things run smoothly.  But does that mean the Test Agencies like UL, CSA, TÜV SÜD, & Intertek that have previously asked OSHA to add the US national version of 3rd ed. of the IEC 60601-1 standard to these lab’s ‘list of Appropriate’ standards will be automatically added to that list?  My guess, at this point, is that OSHA will have to qualify each test lab that wants to be added to this list for AAMI ES 60601-1.  How long will this take?  And what will that qualification look like as now OSHA has to deal with qualifying the safety test agencies for the review and approval of the risk management process for medical electrical devices (a new concept for them I would suspect), among other potential issues?  That’s a good set of questions and I have an e-mail into OSHA to ask all these types of questions and when I get some feedback from them I will send an update out to all of you.  

Note, the Notice in the Federal Register had a fairly major typo, which I already pointed out to my contact, and that is the notice should have identified the standard as AAMI ES 60601-1:05/(R):12 + A1:12 + C1:09/(R):12 + A2:10/(R):12 (this is the US National version of IEC 60601-1:05 + A1:12) and instead they had a big set of typos that says in this notice “AAMI ES 60601-1” (they missed all the details to id it as Amendment 1 – Ooooops) and the title they refer to is “Medical Electrical Equipment—Part 1-2: General requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance—Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility (third edition)”.  The items that are underlined, bolded and italicized are the wrong standard name.  And I believe they should be very specific for this version of the standard and that is why I am pointing out the full AAMI ES identifier in this post and sending it to my contact at OSHA. He already said they are checking into the typos.  Hopefully the typos can be fixed quickly so that it doesn’t slow down the process anymore.

So, hopefully by mid next year, or hopefully before then, OSHA will be able to say they have one or more of the NRTL’s online for issuing NRTL safety agency marks as that will mean those safety test agencies will be able to start to issue the NRTL mark to the AAMI ES 60601-1:05/(R):12 + A1:12 + C1:09/(R):12 + A2:10/(R):12 version of the standard.  So, another question comes up will the Safety Agencies be able to leverage from previous testing done by these Safety Test Agencies or will they need to start a totally new test project before they can issue the NRTL mark for this standard?  I will make sure that OSHA get’s all these questions and hopefully they will be able to respond to these questions and answers publicly.  That I really am not sure about yet. 

If your company needs help with edition 3.0 or 3.1 for AAMI ES 60601-1 or IEC or EN 60601-1 gap analysis, preparation of the risk management file for these versions of the standard, or training on the Standard, please contact Leo Eisner at: Leo@EisnerSafety.com.  

Sign-up for our monthly newsletter to keep up to date on all our posts.  Go to the upper left hand corner of any page on the site and sign-up to enjoy articles like this.  Make sure to reply to the confirmation e-mail otherwise you won’t be signed up.

So, you can get to the important areas for you I have split this blog into several sections that you can jump too quickly by clicking on the below links:

• When did the IEC 60601-1 A1 come out?
• What is the status of the EN 60601-1 A1?
• Is EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 Harmonized under the MDD Yet?
• What about all the other EN 60601 series of standards?
• So, what is Annex ZA about?
• And what about Annex ZZ?

When did the IEC 60601-1 A1 come out?

Amendment 1 (A1) of IEC 60601-1:2005 (3^rd ed.) was published last summer on 13 July 2013 and the consolidated edition (edition 3.1 = IEC 60601-1:2005 + A1:2012) was published on 20 August 2012.  The consolidated edition is very useful as it shows all the redlines of the 496 changes that were made for A1 vs the original 3^rd ed.

What is the status of the EN 60601-1 A1?

So, for Europe it has taken over a year to get the EN (European Norm) of A1:2013 to EN 60601-1:2006 (third edition) to be ratified by CENELEC which was on 24 Sept 20013, then it became available for publication (Date of Availability) in Europe on 4 October 2013 and so now it is allowed to be published in Europe and must be implemented or published by all of the EU countries by 24 June 2014.  The only country that I have been able to find it published in is Denmark as a Dansk Standard (DS or in English it would be Danish Standards).  It is DS/EN 60601-1:06/A1:13 issued on 15 October 2013.

Is EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 Harmonized under the MDD Yet?

The answer is a no, not yet but we are getting pretty close to it occurring.   It hasn’t been Harmonized yet but soon it will be approved as a Harmonized Standard.  This document tells a lot of the story for the history of the Harmonization process for EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13.  This version of the standard has been reviewed and approved for harmonization by the Consultants so its only a matter of publishing it in the Official Journal of the EU (OJ).

What about all the other EN 60601 series of standards?

If you read thru the document referenced in the previous paragraph you will find there are 41 total 60601 series standards in the pipeline that are all expected to flood out of the OJ as Harmonized Standards under the MDD by the end of the 1^st quarter of 2014.  That’s a lot of change to come in a short period of time.  But realize that is not the full series of 60601 standard out there & note there are Joint IEC/ISO projects that are titled 80601 series too.  So, keep your eyes and ears peeled and open to keep up with what will be happening soon.

So, what is Annex ZA about?

Annex ZA is a listing of normative (required or mandated) references to international publications with their corresponding European publications.  This is a list of the European & EU Harmonized standards.  This primarily changes most of the IEC and ISO standards that are referenced in IEC 60601-1:06 + A1:13 (ed. 3.1) to EN & EN ISO standards for the EN version of the standard.  The standards that change in the base of the standard are marked by (mod.) to indicate the original requirements have been modified by common modifications as noted in the beginning of Annex ZA.  There are some that stay as IEC & ISO standards but most change.  But that isn’t the bombshell.  When A1:12 of IEC 60601-1:05 was published a decision was made to go from dated references for the IEC 60601 series standards (i.e. IEC 60601-1-2:2007) to primarily undated references (IEC 60601-1-2), unless a specific standard reference didn’t meet the criteria for the change (most changes occurred and a few stayed as dated references).  The primary reason for this change was to make the standards development maintenance process of the whole series of standards (almost 60 standards in the series & growing) easier to update when there was a change in a Particular (i.e. IEC 60601-2-XX) or a Collateral standard (i.e. IEC 60601-1-XX).  About a year ago under the IEC A1 version of 60601-1 undated references came about but that now has been changed back to dated references in the EN version of the standard (EN60601-1:06 +A1:13).  This means, as it says at the beginning of Annex ZA, “For dated references, only the (dated) edition cited applies.”  Annex ZA also says “For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.”

So, for the IEC series of 60601 standards you currently have the Collaterals and Particulars being updated or will be updated in the near future (now thru about 2 years from now) to reflect the undated standards references to filter through-out the whole series of IEC 60601 standards.  So, more change to keep an eye out for.  Some people would say you need to have a Master’s degree to keep up with this but you could rely on consultants, like me, as this is one of my many job duties is to keep up-to-date on standards development information so I can keep my client’s informed & up-to-date.

And what about Annex ZZ?

Annex ZZ is a fairly long section clocking in at 19 pages long and part of the focus is on the Risk Management Process of sub-clause 4.2.2 of EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 as the EN ISO 14971:2012 standard is the Harmonized standard most recently called out in the EU MDD Harmonized List of Standards (a voluntary listing but easiest way to prove compliance too) and is a significant modification of ISO 14971:2007 with some major changes to it.  So read on for more details with respect to the changes for risk management, among other issues for this Annex ZZ.

Annex ZZ is titled the “Relationship between this European Standard and the Essential Requirements of EU Directive 93/42/EEC on Medical Devices”. Annex ZZ is a means for showing conformance to meeting the parts of the Essential Requirements (ER’s), Annex I, of the MDD under 93/42/EEC as amended by 2007/47/EC, that apply to the standard EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13.  This standard doesn’t confer compliance with all of the ER’s under the MDD only certain ER’s in whole or in part.  I am repeating the first page text of Annex ZZ in “quotes” below and then writing my commentary, in italics, to explain each section.

“This European Standard has been prepared under a mandate given to CENELEC by the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association to provide a means of conforming to the Essential Requirements given in Annex I of the EC Directives 93/42/EEC as amended by 2007/47/EC.”

This means that EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 Annex ZZ will be the means to prove conformance to the ER’s of the MDD in whole or part based on a mandate to CENELEC from the European Commission & EFTA.

“Once this standard will be cited in the Official Journal of the European Union under that Directive, compliance with the clauses of this standard given in Table ZZ.1 confers, within the limits of the scope of this standard, a presumption of conformity with the corresponding Essential Requirements (ERs) of that Directive and associated EFTA regulations.”

Once this standard is Harmonized under the MDD (via publication thru the OJEU) compliance with the clauses of the standard, within the limits of the scope of the standard, cited in Table ZZ.1 confers a presumption of conformity with the corresponding ER’s of the MDD & associated EFTA regulations (MDD adopted by EFTA). 

 “NOTE 1     This standard is intended to be applied in its entirety only. Selected clauses or subclauses may be not applicable due to the specific type of equipment under consideration. It is necessary to understand and apply Clauses 1 to 5. It is also recommended to understand and apply those clauses which contain general requirements related to a specific subclause. Elements of the standard that are not cited in Table ZZ.1 may be relevant for the appropriate fulfilment of certain essential requirements through indirect reference, and for safety and performance aspects of the device, that are not addressed through essential requirements.”

You must use the whole standard.  You can’t just pick and choose clauses you need the whole enchilada otherwise not a valid evaluation of the product.  But you may be able to cite & provide justification that certain clauses & sub-clauses don’t apply to your specific device.  Clauses 1 thru 5 of the standard must be applied and understood completely and well.  These clauses include the scope of the standard, the object, how the Particular and Collateral standards of the 60601 series of standards apply, which standards are normative references and how they work (dated vs undated), terminology & definitions, general requirements which includes discussion of & requirements for:

• Conditions of the equipment to be tested and analyzed
• The Risk Management Process
• Essential Performance
• Expected Service Life
• Equivalent Safety
• Parts that touch the Patient but aren’t to be marked as Applied Parts
• Single Fault Condition
• Component requirements
• Use of High-Integrity Components
• Power Supply issues

And General Requirements for Testing the ME Equipment

• Type Tests
• Number of Samples for testing
• Environmental issues
• Test conditions
• Repairs and modifications
• Humidity preconditioning
• Sequence of tests
• Determination of Applied Parts vs Accessible Parts

 Also, all clauses that apply general requirements related to specific sub-clauses must be considered & addressed.  Even if there are specific sub-clauses that aren’t cited in the Table ZZ.1 that doesn’t mean they aren’t valid to help meet some of the ER’s even if indirectly & for safety & performance aspects of the device, not addressed through the ER’s.

“NOTE 2     Where a reference from a clause of this standard to the risk management process is made, the risk management process needs to be in compliance to the MDD (Directive 93/42/EEC amended by 2007/47/EC). This means that risks have to be reduced “as far as possible”, “to a minimum”, “to the lowest possible level”, “minimized” or “removed”, according to the wording of the corresponding essential requirement.”

Where there is a reference made from a clause of the standard EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 to the risk management process, the risk management process needs to be in compliance with the MDD.  This means that risks have to be reduced according to the specific wording of the corresponding ER.  Such as with the wording “as far as possible”, “to a minimum”, etc.

“NOTE 3     With respect to note 4 of clause 4.2.2 General requirement for risk management, the manufacturer’s policy for determining acceptable risk must be in compliance with essential requirements 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 12 of the directive.”

Note 4 of clause 4.2.2 “General requirement for risk management” states:

“NOTE 4     Where requirements of this standard refer to freedom from unacceptable RISK, acceptability or unacceptability of this RISK is determined by the MANUFACTURER in accordance with the MANUFACTURER’S policy for determining acceptable RISK.” 

This infers that the standard IEC 60601-1:05 + A1:12 requires that Risk is determined by the Manufacturer’s policy for determining acceptable risk which is the Risk Management Process under ISO 14971:2007 per the IEC standard (ed. 3.1) but once you get into the MDD & EN Harmonized standard it will be EN ISO 14971:2012 based on the conversion done in Annex ZA.

So, continuing on — Risk is determined by the Manufacturer’s policy for determining acceptable risk which is the Risk Management Process under EN ISO 14971:2012 for the ER’s 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 & 12 of the MDD.  When you look at Table ZZ.1 you will see in a greyed out area of the top of each ER section for ER’s 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 & 12 there is a note that says “General Guidance note 2 and 3 shall be observed” which infers that you need to follow the risk management process stated in these specific ER’s per EN ISO 14971:2012 Annex ZA (for the MDD) which is where all the modifications of the Risk Management standard were made by the EU Commission causing total havoc for the EN ISO version of the standard even though not in the main text of the standard Annex ZA has caused a total mess of what was once a specific standard and now has been jumbled and makes it hard to meet risk management requirements for multiple countries when one of them is the EU and there are other countries involved as ISO 14971 & EN ISO 14971 are in direct conflict with each other.  You can meet one but not both at the same time from what I have surmised.

“NOTE 4     References in the clauses 3 to 17 or in the Annexes of this standard specify whether the normative references listed in Clause 2 as cited in Annex ZA are to be applied in whole or in part.”

Clauses 3 to 17 (the meat of the standard) and the Annexes of the standard EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 specify whether the mandatory (normative) references listed in Clause 2 (the clause for all the Normative References of the standard), which in the EN version of the standard is replaced by the citations in Annex ZA for clause 2, are to be applied in whole (the whole standard) or in part (a certain portion of the standard) as noted in the standard itself.  

“NOTE 5     This Annex ZZ is based on Normative References according to Annex ZA, replacing the references in the core text.”

Annex ZZ of this EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 standard is based on the Normative references of Annex ZA (Normative Standards that were replaced from IEC & ISO standards to the European EN, EN ISO, & HD standards in the EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 version of the standard).  Bottom line this means that all the IEC 60601-1:05 + A1:12 normative references are to be replaced by the Annex ZA normative standards references for the EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 version of the standard.

“WARNING: Other requirements and other EU Directives and Regulations may be applicable to the product(s) falling within the scope of this standard.”

This simply means that the MDD is not the only Directive that may apply.  Some examples of Directives and Regulations that may apply include the following examples:

• Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS2) Directive 
• This is coming up for most medical device manufacturers in June of 2014.  That’s not a lot of time to get ready for this process.  If you would like to learn more about this process for the medical device manufacturer please join me in a presentation on RoHS2 for the Medical Device Industry on 17 Dec 2013.
• Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive
• Machinery Directive
• Radio and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment (R&TTE) Directive
• Privacy / data protection Clinical data and other personal data Directive
• Regulation on electronic instructions for use of medical devices
• Etc.

Note, that Axon Lawyers has prepared a document for their local RAPS group on the associated Directives that may apply to your EU medical devices and they have been generous to allow all of us to have access to it.  So, thank you Erik Vollebregt for one of your many resources that has helped my clients and I to understand better the implication of the Warning in Annex ZZ of EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13. 

So, get a copy of the standard EN 60601-1:06 + A1:13 so you can have access to the important Annex ZA and Annex ZZ.   If you follow the details noted there you should be in good shape. Annex ZZ is a useful tool to make it easier to know what ERs are applicable to the 60601-1 standard and what is expected instead of doing it blindly for so many years without that support. Last week I actually used this table in Annex ZZ very successfully to audit a MDD Technical Files ER checklist and it provided a wealth of information that just made my life a lot easier and will make yours a lot easier too if you need to put an ER Checklist together for your next Technical File or for a Design Dossier too.

I remember when first working on the IEC based standard that I am a convener of (IEC/ISO 80601-2-58) I was requested to work on the parallel EN standard.  Someone in our Joint Working Group (JWG) suggested that we (the JWG) put together an Annex ZZ but I was later told by some in Europe the 60601 series of standards wasn’t doing that yet because of some political issues that I was never clear on. So, I guess we finally broke that cycle, many years later, and now many of the 60601 series of standards are slated to go thru this process (41 thru the end of 1^st quarter of 2014). I think at first probably the more popular ones will get processed and who knows how long it will take to get all of them processed thru.

If your company needs help with edition 3.0 or 3.1 for EN or IEC 60601-1 gap analysis, preparation of the risk management file for these versions of the standard, or training on the Standard, please contact Leo Eisner at: Leo@EisnerSafety.com.

Sign-up for our monthly newsletter to keep up to date on all our posts.  Go to the upper left hand corner of any page on the site and sign-up to enjoy articles like this.  Make sure to reply to the confirmation e-mail otherwise you won’t be signed up.