If you are interested in the IEC 60601 Series of Standards for Medical Electrical Equipment (MEE) and Medical Electrical Systems (MES), this is the group that will allow you to share your experiences, ask questions and discuss your opinions. This is a platform for 60601 experts, and those that want to learn more, to discuss topics related to this large set of standards related to MEE & MES including 7 Collateral Standards (and counting) and over 60+ Particular Standards. In addition to these Particular Standards, there are many other standards that apply to MEE & MES. 

This series of standards is very important in the medical device regulatory world as the IEC 60601 series of standards are the “Gold” standard for national regulatory agencies such as the FDA, Health Canada, The EU Medical Device Directives (MDD & AIMDD), the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare (MHLW), and many other national regulators. Most countries adopt these standards into their national standards mostly without modification but on occasion national deviations are needed to meet the national electrical code among many other issues. 

This group is here to discuss a wide range of topics related to the IEC 60601 series of standards, the regulatory impact of these standards (such as the differences in 3rd ed. vs 2nd ed. of IEC 60601-1 & country specific regulatory impacts), the changes continually happening in this field (i.e. 3rd ed. of IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1, 3rd ed. + Amendment 1, etc.), what are the regulatory requirements for specific countries as they evolve (like in the Middle East & Asia), and many more topics within the medical device world are also up for play.

The group is run by Leo Eisner of Eisner Safety Consultants, an expert in the IEC 60601 series of standards, and the group is owned by IEC.  Please come and join us in this new adventure and see what you can bring to this new group and/or learn from your group members.

* NOTE:  The IEC is the owner of this LinkedIn sub-group under their main umbrella IEC LinkedIn Group.  Leo Eisner is the manager of the group and if you have any questions with regard to the IEC 60601 series of standards on Medical Electrical Equipment Sub-Group please contact Leo.

You don’t have to leave your office to join in on the presentation and as a special thank you for visiting us at Eisner Safety Consultants you can get a 20% discount.  To find out more about the presentation & discount just click here for the details and also some other past presentations that Eisner Safety Consultants have presented for FX Conferences previously.

Currently, HC recognizes both 2nd & 3rd edition of IEC 60601-1.  Based on what has been published, before this notice, after June 1, 2012 HC would only accept IEC 60601-1, 3rd ed. with the related Collateral standards (i.e. IEC 60601-1-XX that are aligned with IEC 60601-1, 3rd ed.) and related Particular standards (i.e. IEC 60601-2-XX that are aligned with IEC 60601-1, 3rd ed.).  This doesn’t work well as there are some Particular standards that aren’t aligned with 3rd ed., as of yet, or that have only recently (in the last year or so) been published by IEC and so many manufacturers haven’t had the time and/or resources to understand the requirements, do any redesign work, update to their labeling, update their Risk Management File to meet IEC 60601-1, 3rd. ed with any related Collateral & Particular standards, prepare the product for testing (including gathering all appropriate information [component info, etc.] to support the testing), test the product that will hopefully show that the manufacturer complies with all the requirements of the IEC 60601-1, 3rd ed. and the applicable Colateral and Particular standards.  That is unless the manufacturer has a lot of resources and are on top of the standards as they are being developed thru IEC and are starting on all this work prior to the applicable standards being published.

So, this HC guidance document sets out the following for the transition rules to be applied as of June 1, 2012:

1. If there is no Particular standard that is directly applicable to the device, it should conform to IEC 60601-1:2005 and its applicable Collateral standards.
2. If there is a Particular standard(s) that is directly applicable to the device and the version that aligns with IEC 60601-1:2005 was published by IEC before June 1, 2009, then the device should conform to IEC 60601-1:2005 and its applicable Collateral standards in addition to the(se) Particular standard(s).
   NOTE: If there are multiple Particular standards that apply to the device you will want to take the latest Particular standard publication date and if that is still before June 1, 2009 use this item 2.  If it is after June 1, 2009n then use item 3.
3. If there is a Particular standard(s) that is directly applicable to the device and the version that aligns with IEC 60601-1: 2005 was published by IEC after June 1, 2009, a three year transition period from the date of publication by IEC will apply.  During this transition, HC will accept conformity to both editions and related Collateral standards (and both will be listed on HC’s List of Recognized Standards).  
   Refer to NOTE in item 2. 

These transition rules will not be applied retroactively, meaning that if you have a HC Medical Device License for your product and you used IEC 60601-1, 2nd ed. unless there is a significant change to your product that impacts the characteristics of IEC 60601 series of standards you won’t have to retest to IEC 60601, 3rd ed and submit for an Amended License Application.  HC doesn’t require meeting the ‘state of the art’ in the same sense as is stated in the Essential Requirements of Annex I in the EU Medical Device Directive (MDD) or similarly in the Active Implantable Medical Device Directive (AIMDD) so the manufacturer only needs to submit to HC when they have a new medical device that requires a HC license or the manufacturer has to amend their HC medical device license because they have significant change(s) to the product(s) that impact characteristics addressed by the 60601 series of standards.

You still can submit for a HC Medical Device License to 2nd edition of IEC 60601-1 before June 1, 2012 but you will need to make sure it is shipped prior to June 1, 2012.

Standards are voluntary per the CMDR so if you have test data to IEC 60601-1, 2nd ed. and the applicable Particular & Collateral Standards you still could submit this test data to HC after the Transition Rules (items 1 – 3 above) prescribe IEC 60601-1:2005 & applicable standards.  The mfr would have to provide a summary of the differences in the testing compared to IEC 60601-1:2005 and provide a rationale to demonstrate that these differences do not affect the validity of the testing in demonstrating of the device’s safety and effectiveness.

The guidance document does state that HC reserves the right to require additional testing deemed necessary to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of any device. 

A very important note is stated near the end of the document which says:

” A Medical Device Licence issued by Health Canada provides authorization to import or sell a medical device in Canada and is evidence that the device meets the requirements of the Medical Devices Regulations.  Manufacturers are reminded that Provincial or Territorial electrical safety requirements are separate and distinct from the requirements of the Regulations.  For further information regarding these requirements, contact the applicable regulatory authorities.  A listing of some such authorities is available at: http://www.csa.ca/cm/ca/en/community/electrical/regulators.”

I (as a medical device consultant, US TAG member of IEC SC 62A & 62D & Convener of SC62D JWG9 {IEC/ISO/AAMI/CENELEC 80601-2-58} and a Notified Body Auditor) am really pleased to see the extremely hard work that has gone into this document and also in the value that it will pass on to all the stakeholders.  There are many stakeholders that were involved in this process including Notified Bodies, NB-MED EN 60601-1:2006 issues team (Thank you for your hard work.), NB-MED, Manufacturers, OEMs, Power Supply Manufacturers, Standards Developers for EN & IEC & other national standards bodies, Test Houses, Consultants, other countries regulatory bodies (i.e. FDA, Health Canada, etc.) and more.  By use of so many different stakeholders that submitted some of these and other questions this document has a much more consistent view on the implementation issues with the complexity of a series of more than 60+ EN 60601 standards.  It is expected that this document will get revised again but when that will happen is not clear at this time.  I would assume once Amendment 1 (A1) to EN / IEC 60601-1:2006 / 2005 is released approximately end of 2012 / Sept 2012 there will be more implementation questions in addition to the ones in section 3.9 (Q & A 3.9.1 thru 3.9.5 related to A1) of this excellent resource.

This document is good for learning about your specific implementation issue(s) or if you have the time I would highly recommend reading the whole document, as this will help you understand the intricacies of some of the situations of implementing EN 60601-1 with respect to the MDD (I’m sure there are more issues but a good portion have been captured by this first version).  I believe this document would be of great help to implement similar guidance documents for many other national medical device regulatory agencies around the world that are transitioning to the 3rd edition of IEC 60601-1:2005 (or their national version of the standard).

The Table of Contents gives a good glimpse into the realm of the issues covered in this document and covers the following topics.  I also provide a further glimpse into the document by summarizing some of the specific issues within those sections (these are the indents furthest to the right):

• History (background of how we got to this point and document)
• Introduction (Section 1 – document intended to clarify many questions as related to implementation of EN 60601-1:2006 within the EU under the MDD)
• Abbreviations (Section 2)
• Questions and Answers (Section 3 – Primary purpose of the document)
• Process how to place products on the EU market (Section 3.1)
• Explain ‘placing med dvc on the market’ in EU; If med dvc doesn’t change, regulation hasn’t changed, why need provide different evidence with new Harmonized Std; are harmonized stds mandatory; do you have to retest to 3rd ed, when product been on the market for years;  why bother with transition date 1 June 2012 when my EC certificate has a 2014 expiration date; does the product in a distribution center equal ‘placed on the market’; Medical Electrical Equipment(MEE)  met 2nd ed. & breaks down after transition period what std applies now for replacement MEE; why does EU require 3rd ed. compliance with new & legacy products;

• Transition process in general (Section 3.2)
• Is use of newest Harmonized stds even if product hasn’t changed after transition date; Would it have been better to have all the stds in the 60601 series have the same transition period; Is there the bandwidth for all the testing that will be required by the EN 60601-1:2006 deadline of 1 June 2012 (for only 3rd ed. without particular stds) that it may hit a critical point;
• Application of EN 60601-1 (Section 3.3)
• Does EN 60601-1:2006 apply to AIMD products; Are mechanical rqrts of 3rd ed. applicable to non-active products; power supply questions – external pwr supply compliant to 2nd ed., pwr supply approved against EN 60950 (ITE equipment), pwr supply part of a complete 2nd ed. compliant medical electrical equipment, my pwr supply mfr isn’t ready for 3rd ed. yet – my options; What do if applying to several countries and the other country(ies) requires 2nd ed. vs 3rd ed. in EU; EN 62304 in relation to 3rd ed. of EN 60601-1; software development issues; if for some reason major redesign needed to meet 3rd ed. are there smart ways to deal with this; how obtain test protocol TRF version G of 3rd ed.; is there a 3rd ed. delta list available for evaluation of an approved 2nd ed. product
• Role of collateral standards (Section 3.4)
• Are Harmonized Standards binding; what happens to collateral stds (i.e. EN 60601-1-XX) that have been integrated into 3rd ed. of 60601-1; how deal with collateral stds that don’t have an edition aligned with 2nd ed. of EN 60601-1 (i.e. EN 60601-1-11 & -1-12)
• Role of particular standards (multiple or late particulars) (Section 3.5)
•  multiple stds related to x-ray; if x-ray equipment has interventional & non-interventional procedures do both EN 60601-2-43 & -2-54 apply; some particular stds that don’t references 3rd ed. of 60601-1 what happens then; is compliance with 3rd ed. required after 1 June 2012 even if part 2 std won’t be released til after transition period; how deal with EN 13544-1:2007 + A1:2009 which is aligned with 2nd ed. of EN 60601-1 and currently there is no development of a 2nd ed. of EN 13544-1; van every kind of IEC or ISO std act as a particular std
• Transition period of EN 60601-1:2006 (Section 3.6)
• Should there be a 3 year transition period for brand new particular standards Harmonized per the Directive {i.e. EN 60601-2-XX}; particular stds with a transition period ending after 1 June 2012; transition date known for EN 60601-2-49; transition issues with EN 60601-2-43; how deal with EN 60601-2-2 & -2-10 which have different transition dates
• Duties of Notified Bodies (Section 3.7)
• ZLG paper 3.5 A1; How an N.B. audit of technical file or design dossier of product that hasn’t started the process, or plan set-up but not start testing, or partially start testing
• Application of Risk Management (Section 3.8)
•  What are the different roles of the applicable stakeholders in this process including the mfr., Notified Body, test house, etc.; equivalent safety (clause 4.5 of 60601-1 3rd ed.); how to deal with the differences between EN 14971:2001 (equivalent to ISO 14971:2000) and EN 14971:2007; mapping rev. G of TRF  for IEC 60601-1:2005 with Risk Management documentation that is required per EN 60601-1:2006
• Amendment 1 related questions (Section 3.9)
• Amendment 1 of 3rd edition of IEC & EN 60601-1 will be published approximately Sept 2012 & around end of 2012.  This is a major amendment with more than 100 changes some very minor and some that will mean more work for the manufacturers to prove compliance and some changes that will benefit the manufacturer.  It is recommended to review the A1 as soon as you can get your hands on it to see what type of impact it will have on you.
• References (Section 4)
• Recommendation for usage (Section 5)
• Applicability of horizontal and role of particular standards (multiple or late particulars) for use in combination with IEC/EN 60601-1, 3rd.ed with respect to X-ray equipment (Annex 1)
• General – applicability of standards (Annex 1, section 1)
• Categorization of X-ray equipment related to its intended use and applicable standards (status 2012-01-20) (Annex 1, Section 2)
• Summary (Annex 1, Section 3)

On March 3rd join FX Conferences and Leo Eisner to learn about the home healthcare environment and the proposed emergency medical services standards, respectively IEC 60601-1-11 & IEC 60601-1-12 (hopefully).  More information can be found on our blog post on this topic.

On March 4th  join Leo Eisner in Foster City, CA as he & several other presenters focus on the topic of “Evolving Risk-Based Regulatory Requirements” for a whole day workshop put on by RAPS (SF Bay Area Chapter) & ASQ (Biomedical Division Northern CA Discussion Group).  Leo will be presenting on the 3rd ed. of IEC 60601-1, the series of standards, and also the impact of change on the medical device industry.  Other topics will include Usability & Human Factors verification, validation, and regulatory requirements; and Clinical evaluation & investigation regulatory requirements. More information can be found on our blog post on this topic.

Biomedical Division Northern California Discussion Group  andSan Francisco Bay Area Chapter

Topic: “Evolving Risk-Based Regulatory Requirements” whole day workshop covering 3 key quality & regulatory areas:

• IEC 60601-1, 3rd ed. general, collateral, and particular standards including essential performance, risk management integration, and the impact of change on industry
• Usability and Human Factors verification, validation, and regulatory requirements
• Clinical evaluation and investigation regulatory requirements

Presenters: Leo Eisner of Eisner Safety Consultants will be co-presenting with Geetha Rao, PhD, VP, risk management and strategy, Triple Ring Technologies, Inc; Ibim Tariah, technical director, BSI Healthcare; Craig J. Coombs, RAC, president, Coombs Medical Device Consulting, Inc.; and Juergen Stetin, president and CEO, PROSYSTEM AG 

When: March 4, 2011 (Friday), presentations start right at 8:30AM check-in 7:45AM with Continental Breakfast

Registration Contact: Wesley Carr or call +1 301-770-2920 ext. 231 Registration form for event, must register by Feb 25, 2011, space is limited

Where: Crown Plaza Mid-Penisula, 1221 Chess Drive Foster City, CA 94404

The current document posted on 22 March 2010 is an update to the previously posted document issued 9 October 2009 on the CENELEC site

The newest document has added in a few critical issues including

• that with the publication of EN 60601-1:2006, compliance with EN 60601-1:1990 and its related collateral standards will no longer give ‘presumption of conformity’ with the European directives covered as of 1 June 2012.  This date 2012 was confirmed by the CENELEC Technical Board in October 2009 (decision D135/C228). Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union is necessary for this decision to enter into force. The publication of the 1 June 2012 date is expected in spring 2010.
• devices should not be presumed to be unsafe simply because they were designed to comply with EN 60601-1:1990 when first introduced into the European market. Whether or not the safety of such devices represents the “state of the art” can only be determined through the application of Risk Management according to EN ISO 14971 and especially with regard to Clause 9 thereof.
• For those medical devices for which a part 2 exists (i.e., a standard labeled EN 60601-2-x or EN 80601-2-x), the transition period for that part 2 is decisive.  If the transition period of the part 2 ends, for example, on 21 November 2011 then, after this date, compliance with the old (‘superseded’) standard no longer gives the presumption of conformity with the Essential Requirements covered by the standard. In this situation, the 1 June 2012 date is not relevant.
• and more CENELEC site link

The document is an update to the current posted document issued 9 October 2009 on the CENELEC site

The newest document will add in a few critical issues including

• that with the publication of EN 60601-1:2006, compliance with EN 60601-1:1990 and its related collateral standards will no longer give ‘presumption of conformity’ with the European directives covered as of 1 June 2012.  This date 2012 was confirmed by the CENELEC Technical Board in October 2009 (decision D135/C228). Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union is necessary for this decision to enter into force. The publication of the 1 June 2012 date is expected in spring 2010.
• devices should not be presumed to be unsafe simply because they were designed to comply with EN 60601-1:1990 when first introduced into the European market. Whether or not the safety of such devices represents the “state of the art” can only be determined through the application of Risk Management according to EN ISO 14971 and especially with regard to Clause 9 thereof.
• For those medical devices for which a part 2 exists (i.e., a standard labeled EN 60601-2-x or EN 80601-2-x), the transition period for that part 2 is decisive.  If the transition period of the part 2 ends, for example, on 21 November 2011 then, after this date, compliance with the old (‘superseded’) standard no longer gives the presumption of conformity with the Essential Requirements covered by the standard. In this situation, the 1 June 2012 date is not relevant.
• and more to be seen when issued on the CENELEC website.  I will post the link to the new FAQ when it is published.